Payment for bad work
Language: English Series: Chartered Surveyor Weekly ; 39(9) 28 May 1992, 72(1)Publication details: 1992Subject(s): Summary: In "Slater v C A Duquemin Ltd", HC 16 April 1992, it was held that the arbitrator decided that contractors were entitled to be paid for defective work since by barring them from the site the employer had prevented them from carrying out their contractual obligations to remedy such works.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB2821-08 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 19281-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB2820-13 Listed building | WB2820-47 Green belt development | WB2820-72 Exemplary damages | WB2821-08 Payment for bad work | WB2821-27 Economic loss not recoverable | WB2821-34 Head`s right to buy school house | WB2821-36 Rectification of register |
In "Slater v C A Duquemin Ltd", HC 16 April 1992, it was held that the arbitrator decided that contractors were entitled to be paid for defective work since by barring them from the site the employer had prevented them from carrying out their contractual obligations to remedy such works.