Legality of related development
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (9424) 17 June 1995, 144-5(2)Publication details: 1995Subject(s): Summary: Reviews the decision in "R v South Northamptonshire DC, ex p Crest Homes" in the light of the "Tesco Witney" case, which cites the "Crest Homes" case as being a good example of the application of the principle set out in DoE Circular 16/91 that planning obligations might properly be used to require developers to meet or contribute to the external costs of the development.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS53112 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 2168-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Reviews the decision in "R v South Northamptonshire DC, ex p Crest Homes" in the light of the "Tesco Witney" case, which cites the "Crest Homes" case as being a good example of the application of the principle set out in DoE Circular 16/91 that planning obligations might properly be used to require developers to meet or contribute to the external costs of the development.