Review claim unjustified
Language: English Series: Times ; 22 May 1992, LT8(1)Publication details: 1992Subject(s): Summary: In "R v West Sussex CC ex parte Wenman and others", QBD 10 May 1992, it was held that an application for judicial review alleging that it failed to supply adequate accommodation for gipsies residing in its area, pursuant to the Caravan Sites Act 1968, was unjustified where no complaint of any kind had been made to the authority or the SoS about the adequacy of such provision and where no adequate enquiry had been made by the applicants` advisers as to their clients` history before the commencement of the proceedings.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB2821-49 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 19728-1001 |
In "R v West Sussex CC ex parte Wenman and others", QBD 10 May 1992, it was held that an application for judicial review alleging that it failed to supply adequate accommodation for gipsies residing in its area, pursuant to the Caravan Sites Act 1968, was unjustified where no complaint of any kind had been made to the authority or the SoS about the adequacy of such provision and where no adequate enquiry had been made by the applicants` advisers as to their clients` history before the commencement of the proceedings.