Interlocutory injunction to restrain trespass
Language: English Series: Times ; 16/2/87 p26Publication details: 1987Subject(s): Summary: In Patel and Others v W H Smith (Eziot) Ltd and Another , CA 28 January 1987, the judge allowed an appeal against a previous decision and held that the plaintiffs should be granted an interlocutory injunction to restrain trespass on their land , even though the trespass had continued over a long period of time and the plaintiffs had suffered no damage.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2308-16 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 19917-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
In Patel and Others v W H Smith (Eziot) Ltd and Another , CA 28 January 1987, the judge allowed an appeal against a previous decision and held that the plaintiffs should be granted an interlocutory injunction to restrain trespass on their land , even though the trespass had continued over a long period of time and the plaintiffs had suffered no damage.