Agreement for lease
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; [1996] EGCS 93, (1) (1/6/96)Publication details: 1996Subject(s): Summary: "Abrol v Kenny" CA 20 May 1996. When a tenant rejects the terms of a new lease and vacates the premises, there is no breach of contract, and so the landlord is not entitled to retain £2,000 deposited in a joint account by the tenant for continuation of the lease.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB3222-33 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 20894-1001 |
"Abrol v Kenny" CA 20 May 1996. When a tenant rejects the terms of a new lease and vacates the premises, there is no breach of contract, and so the landlord is not entitled to retain £2,000 deposited in a joint account by the tenant for continuation of the lease.