Planning gain
Language: English Series: EGCS ; 1991 68Publication details: 1991Subject(s): Summary: Safeway Properties Ltd v SOS for the Environment and another CA 14 June 1991 involved a claim by the appellant company that the inspector had erred in applying the tests prescribed in DOE Circular 22/83 in considering an application for planning permission to build a superstore . The inspector had found in favour of the applicant company at the original hearing in August 1989 but had dismissed the appeal brought by the appellant company against the first respondent Greenwich LBC under the Town and Country Planning Act 1971 S245 on the grounds that the traffic management measures were a planning gain . At the second appeal it was agreed that the inspector had failed to investigate everything thoroughly. Appeal allowed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2725-44 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 21225-1001 |
Safeway Properties Ltd v SOS for the Environment and another CA 14 June 1991 involved a claim by the appellant company that the inspector had erred in applying the tests prescribed in DOE Circular 22/83 in considering an application for planning permission to build a superstore . The inspector had found in favour of the applicant company at the original hearing in August 1989 but had dismissed the appeal brought by the appellant company against the first respondent Greenwich LBC under the Town and Country Planning Act 1971 S245 on the grounds that the traffic management measures were a planning gain . At the second appeal it was agreed that the inspector had failed to investigate everything thoroughly. Appeal allowed.