Makro Self-service Wholesalers Ltd v Brennan (VO)
Language: English Series: Rating Appeals ; [1996] RA 341-408(35)Publication details: 1996Subject(s): Summary: LT 30 November 1995. VO argued that the Cash and Carry was not an ordinary warehouse and the valuation should be amended accordingly. Held that if the property were vacant its most obvious use would be as a warehouse and the only differentiations were a superior finish and large car parking provision and value should be based on general level of warehouse values with an allowance of 6.6% for superior finishes.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS56111 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 21294-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
LT 30 November 1995. VO argued that the Cash and Carry was not an ordinary warehouse and the valuation should be amended accordingly. Held that if the property were vacant its most obvious use would be as a warehouse and the only differentiations were a superior finish and large car parking provision and value should be based on general level of warehouse values with an allowance of 6.6% for superior finishes.