Validity of notice
Language: English Series: Times ; 5 January 1996, 33(1)Publication details: 1996Subject(s): Summary: "Marath and another v MacGillivray" CA 2 February 1996. "Held" that a notice from landlord to tenant was valid under the Housing Act 1988 s8 if it clearly alleged that three months rent was overdue. It was not necessary for for the notice to contain a schedule of the arrears.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB3206-45 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 21332-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB3206-20 Compensation | WB3206-43 Lease or licence | WB3206-44 Rent Acts | WB3206-45 Validity of notice | WB3206-52 Material considerations | WB3206-53 Planning permission | WB3207-15 CPO for passenger interchange |
"Marath and another v MacGillivray" CA 2 February 1996. "Held" that a notice from landlord to tenant was valid under the Housing Act 1988 s8 if it clearly alleged that three months rent was overdue. It was not necessary for for the notice to contain a schedule of the arrears.