Planning permission
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; (1996) EGCS 12 (03/02/96)Publication details: 1996Subject(s): Summary: "Hart DC v SoS Environment and another" QBD 17 January 1996. Concerned the development of a site. H appealed against SoS decision to allow a landowner (X) to appeal against H`s initial decision, on the grounds that the inspector failed to have regard to material consideration. H`s argument that the inspector should have applied "Ravebuild Ltd v SoS Environment and Hammersmith" was dismissed. Application dismissed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB3206-53 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 21398-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB3206-44 Rent Acts | WB3206-45 Validity of notice | WB3206-52 Material considerations | WB3206-53 Planning permission | WB3207-15 CPO for passenger interchange | WB3207-32 Order for rectification | WB3207-37 Conditional leave to defend |
"Hart DC v SoS Environment and another" QBD 17 January 1996. Concerned the development of a site. H appealed against SoS decision to allow a landowner (X) to appeal against H`s initial decision, on the grounds that the inspector failed to have regard to material consideration. H`s argument that the inspector should have applied "Ravebuild Ltd v SoS Environment and Hammersmith" was dismissed. Application dismissed.