Ramdas Bidaisee v Dorinda Yusidai Sampath and others

Language: English Series: New Property Cases ; (1995) NPC 59Publication details: 1995Subject(s):

Summary: Privy Council 3 April 1995. (From Trinidad and Tobago.) An applicant for specific performance fails to invalidate a completion notice making time of the essence and is unable to draw the Board into a consideration of Legione v Hateley. NOT TO BE PHOTOCOPIED.

Holdings ( 1 )
Title notes ( 1 )

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Call number	Copy number	Status	Barcode
Law report	London Journal article	X2112 (Browse shelf(Opens below))	1	Available	21832-1001

Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)

Previous	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	Next
Previous	X2109 Escalus Properties v Robinson; Escalus Properties v Dennis Escalus Properties v Cooper-Smith; Sinclair Gardens Investments v Walsh	X2110 Trustees of the Property of W L Dennis v Goodman and another	X2111 Broadgate Square plc v Lehman Brothers	X2112 Ramdas Bidaisee v Dorinda Yusidai Sampath and others	X2113 Hambleton DC v Bird and Floyd	X2114 Dunlop v SoS and Cambridgeshire CC	X2115 Mohamed v Manek and Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea	Next

Privy Council 3 April 1995. (From Trinidad and Tobago.) An applicant for specific performance fails to invalidate a completion notice making time of the essence and is unable to draw the Board into a consideration of Legione v Hateley. NOT TO BE PHOTOCOPIED.

Print
Cite
Send to device
Save record
BIBTEX Dublin Core MARCXML MARC (non-Unicode/MARC-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8, Standard) MODS (XML) RIS ISBD
More searches

Search for this title in:
Other Libraries (WorldCat) Other Databases (Google Scholar) Open Library (openlibrary.org)