Romulus Trading Co Ltd and another v Comet Properties Ltd
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; [1996] 48 EG 157-161(5) (30/11/96)Publication details: 1996Subject(s): Summary: QBD 6 March 1996. R holds a business tenancy from C, and A is a subtenant. In December 1993 R granted an underlease of nearby premises to A. C issued proceedings, contending that R was in breach of covenant and their obligation not to derogate from their grant. R applied to strike out the claim on grounds that it disclosed no reasonable course of action. Application allowed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS56232 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 22098-1001 |
QBD 6 March 1996. R holds a business tenancy from C, and A is a subtenant. In December 1993 R granted an underlease of nearby premises to A. C issued proceedings, contending that R was in breach of covenant and their obligation not to derogate from their grant. R applied to strike out the claim on grounds that it disclosed no reasonable course of action. Application allowed.