Robinson v Moody
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; 1994 37 EG 154-158(5)Publication details: 1994Subject(s): Summary: CA 28 January 1994. Appeal by tenant against the cc ruling that appointment of an arbitrator was invalid on the grounds that the three-month time limit from the date of the tenant`s counternotice prescribed by Agricultural Holdings (Arbitration on Notices) Order 1987 article 10A had expired. Held, as the arbitrator had accepted his appointment by letter dated 11 June, the date of appointment was the 11th and not the 15th, and was within the three-month time limit. Appeal allowed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS51331 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 22220-1001 |
CA 28 January 1994. Appeal by tenant against the cc ruling that appointment of an arbitrator was invalid on the grounds that the three-month time limit from the date of the tenant`s counternotice prescribed by Agricultural Holdings (Arbitration on Notices) Order 1987 article 10A had expired. Held, as the arbitrator had accepted his appointment by letter dated 11 June, the date of appointment was the 11th and not the 15th, and was within the three-month time limit. Appeal allowed.