Gateshead MBC v SoS Environment
Language: English Series: Journal of Planning and Environment Law ; 1995 JPL 432-440(9)Publication details: 1995Subject(s): Summary: CA 21 May 1994. Clinical waste incinerator - duality of control - Town and Country Planning Act - Environmental Protection Act - planning permission refused - environmental consequences to surroundings - environmental impact of emissions a material consideration - public concern could only be a material condiseration if it were justified otherwise little if any industrial development would ever be allowed - if the discharges were bound to be unacceptable so that HMIP would refuse authorisation, planning permission should be refused - in the absence of such clear evidence the issues were clearly within the jurisdiction of HMIP - grant of planning permission by Sos upheld (Journal abstract)| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | X2180 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 22357-1001 |
CA 21 May 1994. Clinical waste incinerator - duality of control - Town and Country Planning Act - Environmental Protection Act - planning permission refused - environmental consequences to surroundings - environmental impact of emissions a material consideration - public concern could only be a material condiseration if it were justified otherwise little if any industrial development would ever be allowed - if the discharges were bound to be unacceptable so that HMIP would refuse authorisation, planning permission should be refused - in the absence of such clear evidence the issues were clearly within the jurisdiction of HMIP - grant of planning permission by Sos upheld (Journal abstract)