A decision which should be challenged

By:

Language: English Series: Contract Journal ; 375(5992) 15 September 1994, 15(1)Publication details: 1994Subject(s):

Summary: Discusses the case "Pigott Foundations Ltd v Shepherd Construction Ltd", and main contractor`s reliance on Cl 13.4 of subcontract DOM/1.

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Call number	Copy number	Status	Barcode
Journal article	London Journal article	ABS51339 (Browse shelf(Opens below))	1	Available	22546-1001

Previous	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	Next
Previous	ABS51336 Silver lining in work cloud	ABS51337 Specification substitution: breaking the chain	ABS51338 The Blair necessities	ABS51339 A decision which should be challenged	ABS51340 A question of perfect timing	ABS51341 A rule made not to be broken	ABS51342 Appeal Court denies clause 30 has link with arbitration	Next

Discusses the case "Pigott Foundations Ltd v Shepherd Construction Ltd", and main contractor`s reliance on Cl 13.4 of subcontract DOM/1.