Norwich Union Life Insurance Society v Attorney General

Language: English Series: New Property Cases ; (1995) NPC 86Publication details: 1995Subject(s):

Summary: Privy Council 9 May 1995. A rent review clause which somewhat unusually did not contain a ratchet provision could not be said not to have been negotiated at arms length. (Headnote from journal) NO PHOTOCOPYING ALLOWED

Holdings ( 1 )
Title notes ( 1 )

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Call number	Copy number	Status	Barcode
Law report	London Journal article	X2214 (Browse shelf(Opens below))	1	Available	22633-1001

Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)

Previous	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	Next
Previous	X2211 Tesco v SoS Environment	X2212 National & Provincial Building Society v Ahmed	X2213 Barnes v Sheffield City Council	X2214 Norwich Union Life Insurance Society v Attorney General	X2215 R v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea ex p. Grillo	X2216 Kened Ltd v Connie Investments Ltd	X2217 Allied Maples Group Ltd v Simmons and Simmons	Next

Privy Council 9 May 1995. A rent review clause which somewhat unusually did not contain a ratchet provision could not be said not to have been negotiated at arms length. (Headnote from journal) NO PHOTOCOPYING ALLOWED

Print
Cite
Send to device
Save record
BIBTEX Dublin Core MARCXML MARC (non-Unicode/MARC-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8, Standard) MODS (XML) RIS ISBD
More searches

Search for this title in:
Other Libraries (WorldCat) Other Databases (Google Scholar) Open Library (openlibrary.org)