Agricultural occupancy
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; (1995) EGCS 33 (1) (4/3/95)Publication details: 1995Subject(s): Summary: "Retter v SoS Environment and another" QBD 20 February 1995. R appealed against refusal of planning permission for a dwelling on site as essential to the needs of agriculture. The inspector found that it was not an agricultural enterprise and therefore PPG7 Annex E did not apply. Appeal not allowed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB3110-42 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 22757-1001 |
"Retter v SoS Environment and another" QBD 20 February 1995. R appealed against refusal of planning permission for a dwelling on site as essential to the needs of agriculture. The inspector found that it was not an agricultural enterprise and therefore PPG7 Annex E did not apply. Appeal not allowed.