Head office overheads
Language: English Series: Chartered Quantity Surveyor ; 11(6) February 1989, 28-29(2)Publication details: 1989Subject(s): Summary: Discusses the validity of contractors` claims for and calculations of head office overheads and established charges. Reviews textbook opinion which perceives head office overheads as a valid claim as direct loss and/or expense. The most common method of calculating a claim is loosely based on a percentage of the original contract sum and the length of the delay . Highlights the decision in Tate and Lyle v GLC and Port of London Authority , HL 1983 Abstract 32350. Lists types of items comprised in head office overheads.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS40320 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 23059-1001 |
Discusses the validity of contractors` claims for and calculations of head office overheads and established charges. Reviews textbook opinion which perceives head office overheads as a valid claim as direct loss and/or expense. The most common method of calculating a claim is loosely based on a percentage of the original contract sum and the length of the delay . Highlights the decision in Tate and Lyle v GLC and Port of London Authority , HL 1983 Abstract 32350. Lists types of items comprised in head office overheads.