Bankers Trust v Namdar
Language: English Series: New Property Cases ; (1995) NPC 139Publication details: 1995Subject(s): Summary: ChD 18 July 1995. A mortgagee may not subrogate on the basis of an obligation which is only assumed contingently and the doctrin of `partial performance` is used to form the basis of an application under s30 Law of Property Act 1925 on the basis that by mortgaging his property and/or leaving his family, a husband had terminated a collateral purpose overriding the duty to sell a co-owned family home. Not to be photocopied.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | X2437 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 24235-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
ChD 18 July 1995. A mortgagee may not subrogate on the basis of an obligation which is only assumed contingently and the doctrin of `partial performance` is used to form the basis of an application under s30 Law of Property Act 1925 on the basis that by mortgaging his property and/or leaving his family, a husband had terminated a collateral purpose overriding the duty to sell a co-owned family home. Not to be photocopied.