Jones and Jones v SoS for Wales

Language: English Series: Property and Compensation Reports ; (1995) 70 P&CR 211-223(13)Publication details: 1995Subject(s):

Summary: CA 1 February 1995. Evidence - affidavit of aggrieved applicant for planning permission directly contradicted by inspector - falsification a remote possibility - whether issues could be resolved without cross- examination - circumstances in which leave for cross-examination should be given. (Journal abstract.)

Holdings ( 1 )
Title notes ( 1 )

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Call number	Copy number	Status	Barcode
Law report	London Journal article	X2474 (Browse shelf(Opens below))	1	Available	24500-1001

Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)

Previous	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	Next
Previous	X2471 R v SoS for Transport, ex parte Ellison	X2472 Houghton v SoS Environment and Bromley LBC	X2473 Tesco Stores Ltd v SoS Environment	X2474 Jones and Jones v SoS for Wales	X2475 South Northamptonshire Council v SoS Environment; Morbaine Ltd v SoS Environment	X2476 R v Runnymede BC, ex parte Smith	X2477 R v Selby DC ex parte Samuel Smith Old Brewery	Next

CA 1 February 1995. Evidence - affidavit of aggrieved applicant for planning permission directly contradicted by inspector - falsification a remote possibility - whether issues could be resolved without cross- examination - circumstances in which leave for cross-examination should be given. (Journal abstract.)

Print
Cite
Send to device
Save record
BIBTEX Dublin Core MARCXML MARC (non-Unicode/MARC-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8, Standard) MODS (XML) RIS ISBD
More searches

Search for this title in:
Other Libraries (WorldCat) Other Databases (Google Scholar) Open Library (openlibrary.org)