The effect of disclaimer: a tale of two cases
Language: English Series: The Conveyancer ; (61) January/February 1997, 24-36(6)Publication details: 1997Subject(s): Summary: Discusses two cases "Hill v East and West India Dock Co." and "Stacey v Hill", which coexisted uneasily on the issue of the effect of a disclaimer of a lease by a trustee-in-bankruptcy or liquidator until the anomaly was ended by "Hindcastle Ltd v Barbara Attenborough Ltd". Outlines the statutory provisions concerning disclaimers and considers the position of sub-tenants following "Hindcastle Ltd v Barbara Attenborough Ltd".| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS56601 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 24786-1001 |
Discusses two cases "Hill v East and West India Dock Co." and "Stacey v Hill", which coexisted uneasily on the issue of the effect of a disclaimer of a lease by a trustee-in-bankruptcy or liquidator until the anomaly was ended by "Hindcastle Ltd v Barbara Attenborough Ltd". Outlines the statutory provisions concerning disclaimers and considers the position of sub-tenants following "Hindcastle Ltd v Barbara Attenborough Ltd".