Country and Metropolitan Homes Surrey Ltd v Topclaim Ltd
Language: English Series: All England Law Reports ; [1997] 1 All ER 254-262(9)Publication details: 1997Subject(s): Summary: ChD 2 April 1996. A contract for the sale of land existed between vendor C and purchaser T. When T did not comply with a notice to complete C claimed the contract was at an end and that the 5% deposit paid was forfeited, with the remaining 5% deposit owed. T claimed repudiation by the vendor and called for return of the deposit. When the property was sold to a third party C issued proceedings against T claiming damages for breach of contract and the outstanding deposit. The court below granted T summary judgment on its counterclaim with damages to be assessed. C`s appeal refused.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS56638 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 24979-1001 |
ChD 2 April 1996. A contract for the sale of land existed between vendor C and purchaser T. When T did not comply with a notice to complete C claimed the contract was at an end and that the 5% deposit paid was forfeited, with the remaining 5% deposit owed. T claimed repudiation by the vendor and called for return of the deposit. When the property was sold to a third party C issued proceedings against T claiming damages for breach of contract and the outstanding deposit. The court below granted T summary judgment on its counterclaim with damages to be assessed. C`s appeal refused.