Camden LBC v Ashton
Language: English Series: Planning Appeal Decisions ; (1995) 10 PAD 630-631(7)Publication details: 1995Subject(s): Summary: 13 April 1995. Failure to determine within prescribed period - application to remove condition form existing listed building consent and for listed building consent for internal rearrangement - Council now minded to grant both applications - whether condition served proper planning purpose - effect on listed building and conservation area - condition imposed at direction of English Heritage - whether power to compel replacement of window existing prior to listing - too general to be enforced - Mutual costs applications - partial order against Council - unneccessary cost in preparing for hearing. TAKEN FROM CASE HEADING.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | X2593 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 25198-1001 |
13 April 1995. Failure to determine within prescribed period - application to remove condition form existing listed building consent and for listed building consent for internal rearrangement - Council now minded to grant both applications - whether condition served proper planning purpose - effect on listed building and conservation area - condition imposed at direction of English Heritage - whether power to compel replacement of window existing prior to listing - too general to be enforced - Mutual costs applications - partial order against Council - unneccessary cost in preparing for hearing. TAKEN FROM CASE HEADING.