City of Glasgow DC v SOS for Scotland
Language: English Series: Scots Law Times ; (1989) SLT 256-258(3)Publication details: 1989Subject(s): Summary: Second Division 18 November 1988 Appeal from SOS (S) decision sustaining an appeal against an enforcement notice issued by the Council (G) in respect of two shop canopies. G claimed that the canopies had been erected without consent. The appeal was on the ground that erection of the canopies fell within Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1972 s62 as the shop name on the canopies was advertising material for which consent was "deemed to be granted". Held, on appeal by G, that canopies erected over shop windows in order to protect goods in the window were a development which required consent and that the advertising incorporated into the canopies did not convert the canopies from development of land into "advertisements.... involving the development of land" which did not require consent. Appeal accordingly allowed and case remitted to S.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS40661 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 25315-1001 |
Second Division 18 November 1988 Appeal from SOS (S) decision sustaining an appeal against an enforcement notice issued by the Council (G) in respect of two shop canopies. G claimed that the canopies had been erected without consent. The appeal was on the ground that erection of the canopies fell within Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1972 s62 as the shop name on the canopies was advertising material for which consent was "deemed to be granted". Held, on appeal by G, that canopies erected over shop windows in order to protect goods in the window were a development which required consent and that the advertising incorporated into the canopies did not convert the canopies from development of land into "advertisements.... involving the development of land" which did not require consent. Appeal accordingly allowed and case remitted to S.