Rent review
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; 1992 EGCS 161 (2) (9 January 1993)Publication details: 1992Subject(s): Summary: Discusses "Prudential Property Services Ltd v Capital Land Holdings Ltd", ChD 16 November 1992, which held that a letter in reply to a notice increasing the rent, stating that the tenant did not agree to the proposed figure did constitute a viable counternotice.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB2902-43 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 25626-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB2902-09 Challenge to findings of fact | WB2902-24 Cement cartel | WB2902-42 Fire insurance | WB2902-43 Rent review | WB2902-44 Service charges | WB2902-61 Costs of inquiry | WB2902-62 Material change of use |
Discusses "Prudential Property Services Ltd v Capital Land Holdings Ltd", ChD 16 November 1992, which held that a letter in reply to a notice increasing the rent, stating that the tenant did not agree to the proposed figure did constitute a viable counternotice.