Planning cases in 1992/1993
Language: English Series: Solicitors` Journal ; 138(17) 6 May 1994, 443-445(3)Publication details: 1994Subject(s):- BATCHELOR V SOS ENVIRONMENT
- BATH SOCIETY V SOS ENVIRONMENT
- BERKSHIRE CC V SCOTT
- BLAENAU GWENT BC V SABZ ALI KHAN
- BRIDE BRICK CO LTD V SOS ENVIRONMENT
- BRITISH RAILWAYS BOARD V SOS ENVIRONMENT
- COLLEY V CANTERBURY DC
- FG WHITLEY & SONS V SOS WALES
- GOOD V EPPING FOREST BC
- KISSELL V SOS ENVIRONMENT
- MOLE VALLEY DC V SMITH
- NATIONAL PARKS
- R V DHAR
- R V HOLDERNESS BC EX P JAMES ROBERT DEVELOPMENTS LTD
- R V METROPOLITAN STIPENDIARY MAGISTRATE EX P LONDON WASTE
- R V THURROCK LBC EX P TESCO
- REIGATE AND BANSTEAD BC V BROWN
- ROZHON V SOS WALES
- SCOTTISH AND NEWCASTLE BREWERIES PLC V SOS ENVIRONMENT
- SOS ENVIRONMENT V CAMBRIDGE CC
- SOUTH LAKELAND DC V SOS ENVIRONMENT
- STOP NOTICES
- TREES
- WAREHOUSES
- PLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS50727 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 26485-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Reviews planning cases heard during the recession, down to about a quarter of the volume before the courts in the late 1980s, and notes there were few decisions of principle. Those cases considered cover conservation areas, gypsies, enforcement notices, development, revocation and compensation, conditions and practice notes.