Berkowitz v M W (St John`s Wood) Ltd and others
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (1995) 14 EG 138-140(3)Publication details: 1995Subject(s): Summary: CA 10 October 1994. The plaintiff vendor claimed that the estate agents had failed to inform him of the subsale of his flat at a substantially higher sum. This subsale was discovered to be bogus to defraud the mortgagee. Held, the estate agents` failure to detect the intention of a subsale by not properly acting on a fax was not a breach of duty. The vendor had not suffered any loss.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS52775 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 44-1001 |
CA 10 October 1994. The plaintiff vendor claimed that the estate agents had failed to inform him of the subsale of his flat at a substantially higher sum. This subsale was discovered to be bogus to defraud the mortgagee. Held, the estate agents` failure to detect the intention of a subsale by not properly acting on a fax was not a breach of duty. The vendor had not suffered any loss.