Third party precedents
Language: English Series: Planning Week ; 2936) 8 September 1994, 14(1)Publication details: 1994Subject(s): Summary: Discusses four recent cases "R v Sheffield CC ex parte Power and others" (WB3022-31), "R v Canterbury CC ex parte Cox" (WB2939-33), "R v Swansea CC ex parte Elitestone Ltd" (Abs49692) and "R v Southwark LBC ex parte Daniel Davies & Co" (1993 EGCS 216) which examined whether third parties have a right to challenge planning decisions which adversely affect their interests.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS51448 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 27504-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Discusses four recent cases "R v Sheffield CC ex parte Power and others" (WB3022-31), "R v Canterbury CC ex parte Cox" (WB2939-33), "R v Swansea CC ex parte Elitestone Ltd" (Abs49692) and "R v Southwark LBC ex parte Daniel Davies & Co" (1993 EGCS 216) which examined whether third parties have a right to challenge planning decisions which adversely affect their interests.