No reasons required for housing decision
Language: English Series: Independent ; 13 June 1995, 16(1)Publication details: 1995Subject(s): Summary: "R v Kensington and Chelsea Royal LBC, ex parte Grillo" CA 11 May 1995. A homeless person had sought a judicial review of the suitability of accommodation offered by the council, which had failed to give reasons why it considered the accommodation suitable. The CA held that it could not force the council to provide reasons where the law did not.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB3123-28 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 3067-1001 |
"R v Kensington and Chelsea Royal LBC, ex parte Grillo" CA 11 May 1995. A homeless person had sought a judicial review of the suitability of accommodation offered by the council, which had failed to give reasons why it considered the accommodation suitable. The CA held that it could not force the council to provide reasons where the law did not.