Image from Google Jackets

Loup and others v SoS Environment and Salisbury DC

Language: English Series: Journal of Planning and Environment Law ; 1995 JPL 22-32(11)Publication details: 1995Subject(s): Summary: CA 19 May 1995. Residential development - proposed by-pass - permission refused - refusal upheld on appeal - decision quashed in High Court - redetermination of appeal - advent of s54A - effect of -second determination upheld refusal - quashed in High Court - appeal to CA - adequacy of SoS reasons - whilst convoluted nonetheless clear - weight to be given to development plan under s54A - allegation of double counting not sustained - matter for decision taker - appeal allowed decision of SoS restored. (Taken from header note)
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Law report London Journal article X2977 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 27637-1001

CA 19 May 1995. Residential development - proposed by-pass - permission refused - refusal upheld on appeal - decision quashed in High Court - redetermination of appeal - advent of s54A - effect of -second determination upheld refusal - quashed in High Court - appeal to CA - adequacy of SoS reasons - whilst convoluted nonetheless clear - weight to be given to development plan under s54A - allegation of double counting not sustained - matter for decision taker - appeal allowed decision of SoS restored. (Taken from header note)