Misconduct
Language: English Series: EGCS ; 1991 20 (2/3/91)Publication details: 1991Subject(s): Summary: In K/S Norjarl A/S v Hyundai Heavy Industries Co Ltd CA 21 February 1991, it was held that the commitment expected of the arbitrator s justifed a request for a commitment fee without amounting to bias . As no agreement had been made, there was no case of misconduct to answer to. Appeal dismissed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2710-02 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 27942-1001 |
In K/S Norjarl A/S v Hyundai Heavy Industries Co Ltd CA 21 February 1991, it was held that the commitment expected of the arbitrator s justifed a request for a commitment fee without amounting to bias . As no agreement had been made, there was no case of misconduct to answer to. Appeal dismissed.