Woolwich Building Society v Dickman and Todd

Language: English Series: New Property Cases ; (1996) NPC 22, (3)Publication details: 1996Subject(s):

Summary: A mortgagee is unable to obtain a possession order against a protected tenant of its defaulting mortgagor even though the tenant has signed a `Boland` consent form. NOT TO BE PHOTOCOPIED

Holdings ( 1 )
Title notes ( 1 )

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Call number	Copy number	Status	Barcode
Law report	London Journal article	X3153 (Browse shelf(Opens below))	1	Available	28769-1001

Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)

Previous	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	Next
Previous	X3150 R v SoS Environment and Hereford & Worcester CC ex p Badman	X3151 Enfield LBC v Castles Estate Agents Ltd	X3152 Chaloner (HMIT) v Pellipar Investments Ltd	X3153 Woolwich Building Society v Dickman and Todd	X3154 Mainwaring v The Trustees of Henry Smith`s Charity	X3155 High Street Investments Ltd & Finance for Mortgages Ltd v Bellshore Property Investments Ltd	X3156 Parkes v Legal Aid Board	Next

A mortgagee is unable to obtain a possession order against a protected tenant of its defaulting mortgagor even though the tenant has signed a `Boland` consent form. NOT TO BE PHOTOCOPIED

Print
Cite
Send to device
Save record
BIBTEX Dublin Core MARCXML MARC (non-Unicode/MARC-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8, Standard) MODS (XML) RIS ISBD
More searches

Search for this title in:
Other Libraries (WorldCat) Other Databases (Google Scholar) Open Library (openlibrary.org)