Agricultural holdings arbitration

Language: English Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; (1995) EGCS 116(1) (8/7/95)Publication details: 1995Subject(s):

Summary: "J W Childers Trustees v Anker" CA 29 June 1995. Concerned the treatment of two parcels of land let under the Agricultural Holdings Act 1948 as amended. The tenancies started at different dates but the agreement at rent review expressed one rent for both holdings. CA allowed the tenant`s claim that there was one holding but held that marriage value was a relevant factor for the arbitrator`s consideration.

Holdings ( 1 )
Title notes ( 1 )

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Call number	Copy number	Status	Barcode
Law report	London Journal article	WB3127-23 (Browse shelf(Opens below))	1	Available	28955-1001

Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)

Previous	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	Next
Previous	WB3126-29 Enforcement notice	WB3126-33 Building society cannot keep surplus	WB3126-35 Negligent valuation	WB3127-23 Agricultural holdings arbitration	WB3127-24 Rent review arbitration	WB3127-25 Rent review of casino	WB3127-29 Conservation area	Next

"J W Childers Trustees v Anker" CA 29 June 1995. Concerned the treatment of two parcels of land let under the Agricultural Holdings Act 1948 as amended. The tenancies started at different dates but the agreement at rent review expressed one rent for both holdings. CA allowed the tenant`s claim that there was one holding but held that marriage value was a relevant factor for the arbitrator`s consideration.

Print
Cite
Send to device
Save record
BIBTEX Dublin Core MARCXML MARC (non-Unicode/MARC-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8, Standard) MODS (XML) RIS ISBD
More searches

Search for this title in:
Other Libraries (WorldCat) Other Databases (Google Scholar) Open Library (openlibrary.org)