Telecommunications
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; (1995) EGCS 121(1) (8/7/95))Publication details: 1995Subject(s): Summary: "Tandridge DC v Telecom Securicor Cellular Radio Ltd" QBD 27 June 1995. Their first telecommunications planning application with requisite fee having been refused, the defendants submitted drawings of a new site but without a fee and written description and without calling it an application. On the expiry of the 28-day notice period, they maintained they had deemed approval. The plaintiffs claim, that the second application was not valid was upheld.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB3127-30 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 29011-1001 |
"Tandridge DC v Telecom Securicor Cellular Radio Ltd" QBD 27 June 1995. Their first telecommunications planning application with requisite fee having been refused, the defendants submitted drawings of a new site but without a fee and written description and without calling it an application. On the expiry of the 28-day notice period, they maintained they had deemed approval. The plaintiffs claim, that the second application was not valid was upheld.