Restormel BC and Lidl U.K. Ltd
Language: English Series: Planning Appeal Decisions ; 1996 11 PAD 70-78(9)Publication details: 1996Subject(s): Summary: Decision letter 3 October 1995. Proposed development of Class A retaill units with associated parking and access. Whether in conflict withh provision of development plan. Likely effect on Newquay town centre. Generation of traffic hazards. Council`s inconsistency in planning terms inn application of planning policies to appeal site and adjacent land and in assessing the traffic hazards attributable to the appeal site pursuant to an extant planning consent and the adjacent site where no planning permission was extant. Appeal allowed. Award of costs against Council in favour of appellant. (Headnote from journal).| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | X3233 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 29349-1001 |
Decision letter 3 October 1995. Proposed development of Class A retaill units with associated parking and access. Whether in conflict withh provision of development plan. Likely effect on Newquay town centre. Generation of traffic hazards. Council`s inconsistency in planning terms inn application of planning policies to appeal site and adjacent land and in assessing the traffic hazards attributable to the appeal site pursuant to an extant planning consent and the adjacent site where no planning permission was extant. Appeal allowed. Award of costs against Council in favour of appellant. (Headnote from journal).