Pendle BC v Bibi
Language: English Series: Planning Appeal Decisions ; 1996 11 PAD 110-113(4)Publication details: 1996Subject(s): Summary: 20 September 1995. Erection of shop front security rollshutters. Whetherr development. Alterations to a building which materially affect its appearance. Held to be development for which planning permission required. Continuing security important. Period for compliance extended from onee month to six months to allow time for obtaining planning permission to erect shutters of an acceptable design. Council to review position where other premises fitted with sutters of similar design and appearance to appellant`s premises. (Headnote from journal).| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | X3240 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 29394-1001 |
20 September 1995. Erection of shop front security rollshutters. Whetherr development. Alterations to a building which materially affect its appearance. Held to be development for which planning permission required. Continuing security important. Period for compliance extended from onee month to six months to allow time for obtaining planning permission to erect shutters of an acceptable design. Council to review position where other premises fitted with sutters of similar design and appearance to appellant`s premises. (Headnote from journal).