Right words at the right time
Language: English Series: Estates Times ; (1286) 30 June 1995, 6(1)Publication details: 1995Subject(s):- COMMISSION FOR THE NEW TOWNS V COOPER (GREAT BRITAIN)
- DEFINITIONS
- HAVENRIDGE V BOSTON DYERS
- HOOPER AND SHERMAN
- IBM (UK) V ROCKWARE GLASS
- IPERION INVESTMENTS V BROADWALK HOUSE RESIDENTS
- P&O PROPERTY HOLDINGS V NORWICH UNION LIFE ASSURANCE
- PIPS (LEISURE PRODUCTIONS) V WALTON
- PROPER AND REASONABLE
- REASONABLE AND BEST ENDEAVOURS
- SUBJECT TO CONTRACT
- UBH (MECHANICAL SERVICES) V STANDARD LIFE ASSURANCE
- WITHOUT PREJUDICE
- LAW
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS53283 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 3244-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Examines how commonly used words, including `without prejudice`, `subject to contract`, `proper and reasonable` and `reasonable and best endeavors`, have been interpreted by the courts and why it is important to choose these words carefully.