Manchester Ship Canal Co et al v SoS Environment
Language: English Series: Journal of Planning and Environment Law ; 1996 JPL 300-303(4)Publication details: 1996Subject(s): Summary: HL 6 July 1995. Multipla representation in planning appeals. Issue of costs. Discretion of the court. Appeals by developer. SoS and development corporation successful. Entitlement to costs. SoS entitled to whole of his costs if successful. Developers requires a separate issue of interest before costs for separate representation allowed. Interests of developer and development corporation identiical. Third set of costs not justified. Second set of costs most likely to be awarded at first instance than in CA or HL (Headnote from journal)| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | X3270 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 29552-1001 |
HL 6 July 1995. Multipla representation in planning appeals. Issue of costs. Discretion of the court. Appeals by developer. SoS and development corporation successful. Entitlement to costs. SoS entitled to whole of his costs if successful. Developers requires a separate issue of interest before costs for separate representation allowed. Interests of developer and development corporation identiical. Third set of costs not justified. Second set of costs most likely to be awarded at first instance than in CA or HL (Headnote from journal)