A case of control over contract completion
Language: English Series: Contract Journal ; 375(5997) 20 October 1994, 14(1)Publication details: 1994Subject(s):- BUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS
- COMPLETION
- CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMMES
- CONTRACT PROGRAMMES
- DUE DILIGENCE
- EXTENSIONS OF TIME
- GREATER LONDON COUNCIL V CLEVELAND BRIDGE AND ENGINEERING CO LTD
- HOOKER CONSTRUCTIONS PTY LTD V CHRISS ENGINEERING
- HOUNSLOW LBC V TWICKENHAM GARDEN DEVELOPMENTS
- PROGRESS
- REGULARLY AND DILIGENTLY
- WEST FAULKNER AND ASSOCIATE V NEWHAM LBC
- BUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS51489 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 30019-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Examines the caselaw affecting unsatisfactory rates of building progress under the PSA contract and GC/Works/1, contracts which, unlike most standard forms, incorporate provision for regular assessment of progress. The terms `regularly and diligently` have been subject to judicial scrutiny in several cases, of which the most significant are reported here.