Permitted development
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; (1994) EGCS 140(1) (6.8.94)Publication details: 1994Subject(s): Summary: "Maidstone BC v SoS Environment and another" QBD 28 July 1994. M, owners of land to be compulsorily purchased by Kent CC, argued that compensation should be commensurate with the type of development it had planned to grant permission for: offices, a hotel and a carpark. Though this was upheld by the inspector, his recommendation was overturned by S whose permitted development, the carpark only, was upheld in court.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB3031-23 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 30056-1001 |
"Maidstone BC v SoS Environment and another" QBD 28 July 1994. M, owners of land to be compulsorily purchased by Kent CC, argued that compensation should be commensurate with the type of development it had planned to grant permission for: offices, a hotel and a carpark. Though this was upheld by the inspector, his recommendation was overturned by S whose permitted development, the carpark only, was upheld in court.