Rent review
Language: English Series: EGCS ; 1989 63Publication details: 1989Subject(s): Summary: In Lynnthorpe Enterprises Ltd v Sidney Smith (Chelsea) Ltd , ChD 28 April 1989, there is a presumption in favour of reality and this clearly requires the terms of the hypothetical lease to reflect variations made to the terms of the actual lease. The lessors` contention that the terms of the 1986 deed, as to use for a restaurant only, were personal to the plaintiffs, and did not bind successors in title was not accepted.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2518-16 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 30414-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
In Lynnthorpe Enterprises Ltd v Sidney Smith (Chelsea) Ltd , ChD 28 April 1989, there is a presumption in favour of reality and this clearly requires the terms of the hypothetical lease to reflect variations made to the terms of the actual lease. The lessors` contention that the terms of the 1986 deed, as to use for a restaurant only, were personal to the plaintiffs, and did not bind successors in title was not accepted.