Image from Google Jackets

Legal implications of an inaccurate diagnosis

By: Language: English Series: Architect and Surveyor ; 64(9) October 1989, 16-17(2)Publication details: 1989Subject(s): Summary: Warns against underpinning as an automatic solution to damage caused by subsidence or heave and discusses case law where it was held that the underpinning was unjustified and damage had not been correctly assessed in terms of BRE Digest 251 .

Warns against underpinning as an automatic solution to damage caused by subsidence or heave and discusses case law where it was held that the underpinning was unjustified and damage had not been correctly assessed in terms of BRE Digest 251 .