Boyle v Verrall
Language: English Series: New Property Cases ; [1996] NPC 123, (2)Publication details: 1996Subject(s): Summary: CA 26 July 1996. A landlord who has not satisfied the first condition for terminating an assured tenancy of a flat under Ground 1 of Schedule 2 of the Housing Act 1988, is nonetheless able to persuade the CA that it would be just and equitable for her to recover possession. TAKEN FROM JOURNAL. NOT TO BE PHOTOCOPIED.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | X3549 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 31106-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
CA 26 July 1996. A landlord who has not satisfied the first condition for terminating an assured tenancy of a flat under Ground 1 of Schedule 2 of the Housing Act 1988, is nonetheless able to persuade the CA that it would be just and equitable for her to recover possession. TAKEN FROM JOURNAL. NOT TO BE PHOTOCOPIED.