Jones and another v SoS for Wales
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; (1995) EGCS 14(1) (11/2/95)Publication details: 1995Subject(s): Summary: "Jones and another v SoS for Wales" CA 1 February 1995. According to the appellants the inspector was biased because after the inquiry he had discussed a document connected with the case with a council representative. The appellants wanted the inspector to be cross-examined. By a majority the appeal was allowed as the accounts of both parties concerning the inspector`s movements were quite different.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB3107-38 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 3415-1001 |
"Jones and another v SoS for Wales" CA 1 February 1995. According to the appellants the inspector was biased because after the inquiry he had discussed a document connected with the case with a council representative. The appellants wanted the inspector to be cross-examined. By a majority the appeal was allowed as the accounts of both parties concerning the inspector`s movements were quite different.