Separate licenses did not create joint tenancy
Language: English Series: Times ; 27/3/89 p24Publication details: 1989Subject(s): Summary: In Stribling v Wickham and others , CA 15 March 1989, it was held that three separate agreements in identical terms, conferring in each case a licence to an occupier to use the premises for a specified period on a shared basis in consideration of monthly payments by each did not create a joint tenancy in the occupiers.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2512-43 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 32113-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB2512-40 Rent Act 1977 | WB2512-41 Rent acts | WB2512-42 Rent review | WB2512-43 Separate licenses did not create joint tenancy | WB2512-44 Modern coal mining | WB2512-45 Capital views | WB2512-46 Catholic church loses right to planning control |
In Stribling v Wickham and others , CA 15 March 1989, it was held that three separate agreements in identical terms, conferring in each case a licence to an occupier to use the premises for a specified period on a shared basis in consideration of monthly payments by each did not create a joint tenancy in the occupiers.