Stevens v East Hampshire Dostrict Council Community Charge Registration Officer and Hampshire North Valuation and Community Charge Tribunal
Language: English Series: Rating Appeals ; 1994 RA 73-77(5)Publication details: 1994Subject(s): Summary: QBD 13 December 1993. The payer of community charge (S) appealed against a decision by a Valuation and Community Charge Tribunal that a flat was not his sole residence but a self contained part of a building which attracted community charge. S owned three flats in a block, two of which had been knocked into one, and the third being three floors up. S however claimed that the third flat was also part of his main residence and was used as spare bedroom accommodation and for his hobby of bookbinding. The appeal was dismissed on the grounds that the third flat`s use was not ancillary to the use being made of the main residence.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS50974 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 3551-1001 |
QBD 13 December 1993. The payer of community charge (S) appealed against a decision by a Valuation and Community Charge Tribunal that a flat was not his sole residence but a self contained part of a building which attracted community charge. S owned three flats in a block, two of which had been knocked into one, and the third being three floors up. S however claimed that the third flat was also part of his main residence and was used as spare bedroom accommodation and for his hobby of bookbinding. The appeal was dismissed on the grounds that the third flat`s use was not ancillary to the use being made of the main residence.