Execution and delivery of deed
Language: English Series: EGCS ; 1989 39Publication details: 1989Subject(s): Summary: In Longman v Viscount Chelsea and others , CA 10 March 1989, it was held that execution of a deed does not import the delivery of a deed. Knowledge that the deed of variation with the neighbour had to be completed first did not make the deed granting the lease to the appellant as escrow which had been delivered.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2512-70 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 33288-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB2512-67 Birmingham | WB2512-68 Teesside | WB2512-69 Spain will be flexible over homes | WB2512-70 Execution and delivery of deed | WB2512-71 Option to purchase | WB2512-72 Regulations to protect privacy | WB2512-73 Retailers still have scope to grow |
In Longman v Viscount Chelsea and others , CA 10 March 1989, it was held that execution of a deed does not import the delivery of a deed. Knowledge that the deed of variation with the neighbour had to be completed first did not make the deed granting the lease to the appellant as escrow which had been delivered.