Demolition not development
Language: English Series: Times ; 12 February 1992, LT11(1)Publication details: 1992Subject(s): Summary: In " SOS for Environment and another v Cambridge CC" CA 5 February 1992, it was held that demolition of houses in order to use the site for car parking and enhancing the visual aspect of nearby development with high quality landscaping did not constitute `development` within the meaning of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 and its predecessors. Appeal allowed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB2807-51 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 33440-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB2807-39 Council can evict trespasser | WB2807-40 No secure tenancy of hostel room | WB2807-41 Possession claim | WB2807-51 Demolition not development | WB2807-61 Servitude | WB2807-63 Wasting asset | WB2808-05 Damages claim validly assigned |
In " SOS for Environment and another v Cambridge CC" CA 5 February 1992, it was held that demolition of houses in order to use the site for car parking and enhancing the visual aspect of nearby development with high quality landscaping did not constitute `development` within the meaning of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 and its predecessors. Appeal allowed.