Aylesbury Vale DC and Ball
Language: English Series: Planning Appeal Decisions ; [1997] 12 PAD 1-17(14)Publication details: 1997Subject(s): Summary: Re-erection of fire damaged/destroyed detached dwelling - built in 1920s - burbt in 1975 - earlier lapsed permissions to replace - renewed four times - structure and local plans - green belt - whether any very special circumstances to rebut presumption against inappropriate development - whether the permission which lapsed in 1991 was "recently expired" - extant planning permission is material consideration - council not bound by expired planning permission - conflict between local and structure plans. Costs - appellant not unreasonable as there is no guidanc eon what is "recent". HEADNOTE FROM JOURNAL.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | X3895 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 33633-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Re-erection of fire damaged/destroyed detached dwelling - built in 1920s - burbt in 1975 - earlier lapsed permissions to replace - renewed four times - structure and local plans - green belt - whether any very special circumstances to rebut presumption against inappropriate development - whether the permission which lapsed in 1991 was "recently expired" - extant planning permission is material consideration - council not bound by expired planning permission - conflict between local and structure plans. Costs - appellant not unreasonable as there is no guidanc eon what is "recent". HEADNOTE FROM JOURNAL.