Salisbury DC and Attrill
Language: English Series: Planning Appeal Decisions ; [1997] 12 PAD 27-31(5)Publication details: 1997Subject(s): Summary: Closing gap in existing stone boundary wall - not possible for Inspector to instruct council to review its decision - listed building in conservation area - end of terrace house - preserving listed building or its setting - character and appearance of conservation area - retrospective consent for new part of wall in reconstituted stone - several artificial stone walls and buildings in conservation area. Costs - Council unreasonable in some respects, but had not caused unnecessary expense.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | X3900 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 33659-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Closing gap in existing stone boundary wall - not possible for Inspector to instruct council to review its decision - listed building in conservation area - end of terrace house - preserving listed building or its setting - character and appearance of conservation area - retrospective consent for new part of wall in reconstituted stone - several artificial stone walls and buildings in conservation area. Costs - Council unreasonable in some respects, but had not caused unnecessary expense.