Hindcastle Ltd v Barbara Attenborough Associates Ltd and others
Language: English Series: All England Law Reports ; (1994) 4 AllER 129-138(6)Publication details: 1994Subject(s): Summary: CA 15 June 1994. H was a landlord who had granted a lease to the first defendants, which was subseqently assigned and reassigned to P. When P went into liquidation, the liquidator issued a disclaimer of the lease, so H sought arrears in rent from the defendants. The second and third defendants appealed against H`s writs, claiming they no longer had any liability for the rent. "Held" that P`s disclaimer did not release the defendants and accordingly appeal dismissed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS51581 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 34020-1001 |
CA 15 June 1994. H was a landlord who had granted a lease to the first defendants, which was subseqently assigned and reassigned to P. When P went into liquidation, the liquidator issued a disclaimer of the lease, so H sought arrears in rent from the defendants. The second and third defendants appealed against H`s writs, claiming they no longer had any liability for the rent. "Held" that P`s disclaimer did not release the defendants and accordingly appeal dismissed.